Astroworld vs PebbleHost

Side by Side

Right-hand column: what that host publishes. It changes without telling us. Middle column: read from our own price list.

Same panel, so look at what is under it

This is the one comparison on the site where the panel is a wash: both sides are Pterodactyl, so the file manager, the console, the schedules and the allocations all work the way you already know. That takes the biggest variable off the table and leaves the two that are easy to overlook. The first is which tier the NVMe is on, because a budget tier on slower storage and a premium tier on NVMe are not the same product under one brand; here it is NVMe on all Mini and up, with no cheaper version underneath. The second is arithmetic: their budget tier is $1.00 a gigabyte, so the 4 GB we put in Mini would be $4.00 a month at that rate, against €6.99 here with 2 vCPU named on it. The third is where the machine is: they list two continents, and ping is the one thing no plan upgrade fixes.

The memory guide has those rows in full.

Questions people ask before switching

Summary

Two hosts on the same panel is a fair fight, and at the small end their budget tier wins on price. What we sell instead is a plan where the cores, the memory and the NVMe are all named and none of them are the premium version of a cheaper thing. If your players are outside the US and the EU, that decides it before any of the rest does.